<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>C.-L. Huang | NJU Astrometry Group</title><link>https://njuastrometry.github.io/en/author/c.-l.-huang/</link><atom:link href="https://njuastrometry.github.io/en/author/c.-l.-huang/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>C.-L. Huang</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>The IAU 2006 precession quantities with an improved Earth's $J_{2}$ long-term variation</title><link>https://njuastrometry.github.io/en/publication/2025-aa-703-l21/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://njuastrometry.github.io/en/publication/2025-aa-703-l21/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="updating-the-long-term-variation-of-earths-oblateness">Updating the long-term variation of Earth&amp;rsquo;s oblateness&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The IAU 2006 precession model incorporates a linear trend in Earth&amp;rsquo;s gravitational coefficient $J_{2}$, which characterizes its oblateness. However, satellite laser ranging observations extending from 1976 to 2025 show that the long-term evolution of $J_{2}$ is better represented by a parabola.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>We use these observations to determine an updated empirical model of $J_{2}$ and incorporate it into the integration of the precession equations. The resulting solution, named IAU $2006_{J_{2}}$, follows the framework of the IAU 2006 model while updating the polynomial expressions for the precession quantities.&lt;/p>
&lt;h2 id="main-results">Main results&lt;/h2>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>A better-supported nonlinear trend:&lt;/strong> Nearly 50 years of satellite laser ranging data provide stronger evidence for a parabolic variation of $J_{2}$ than was available in earlier studies.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Revised precession quantities:&lt;/strong> The updated $J_{2}$ model mainly changes the quadratic and cubic terms of the precession in longitude, while the precession in obliquity remains close to the IAU 2006 solution.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Improved agreement with VLBI:&lt;/strong> Comparisons with the C04 and OPA2025a celestial pole offset series show that the updated model removes most of the residual curvature in $\mathrm{d}X$.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Smaller residuals before empirical fitting:&lt;/strong> The weighted root-mean-square values decrease from 179 to 130 microarcseconds for C04 and from 193 to 147 microarcseconds for OPA2025a.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;h2 id="implications">Implications&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>The results provide observational support for updating the precession model within the IAU 2006 framework. The paper proposes the solution for consideration by the IAU/IAG CIERT working group and in a future revision of the IERS Conventions.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Further work on the corresponding nutation corrections is needed to ensure consistency between precession and nutation when the time variation of Earth&amp;rsquo;s dynamical flattening is taken into account.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>